Skip to main content

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN HISTORICAL SITES AND MUSEUMS

A historic site or heritage site is an official location where pieces of political, military, cultural, or social history have been preserved due to their cultural heritage value. Historic sites are usually protected by law, and many have been recognized with the official national historic site status. In the other hand museum a building or place where works of art, scientific specimens, or other objects of permanent value are kept and displayed.


The following are difference between historic sites and museum
  • Historic sites is the original place where man once lived and performed some activities while museum is the building which preserves historical remains  collected from different places
  • Historic sites is the work place of archaeologists while museum preserves artifacts brought by archaeologists
  • Historic sites may be very large in size while museum it consist of building which only take in most cases small area

READ MORE

































 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reasons for the Coming of Christian Missionaries in East Africa

Missionaries came to East Africa for various reasons. These were economic, social, and humanitarian in nature.  The missionaries had the ambition to spread Christianity to the people of East Africa. This would be through preaching and teaching the holy gospel so that many would get converted to Christianity  They wanted to fight against slave trade in East Africa. Earlier travelers like John Speke and James Grant, H.M. Stanley, Dr. David Livingstone and others had reported about the evils of slave trade in East Africa. Christian missionaries therefore came with an intention of putting an end to end introducing or replacing it with legitimate trade.  Missionaries wanted to resettle the freed slaves in East Africa by setting up resettlement centers both in the interior and at the coast for example at Bagamoyo and Free town near Mombasa.  They wanted to check on the spread of Islam in East Africa from the coast with intentions of converting many to Christianity.  Some missiona
Post a Comment
Read more

ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF ORAL TRADITION

Oral tradition can be defined as testimony transmitted by word of mouth from one generation to another. Here the information is obtained by talking and listening to people with historical information especially elders. The message transmitted orally, were preserved by memory The following are advantages of all tradition It can be given anywhere and any time by adult who have some historical facts It is less expensive compared to other source of historical information such as books and museums. this is because it does not need selling and buying of information It does not need a person to know how to read and write It is possible to ask questions to the oral informant so as to in-depth information The following are disadvantages of oral traditions Oral tradition does not go very far in the past. the transmission of information depend on the power of memories of successive generations Oral tradition does not maintain the same value of the oral history; instead the
11 comments
Read more

TERMS OF THE DEVONSHIRE WHITE PAPER

THE FOLLOWING WERE THE TERMS OF DEVONSHIRE WHITE PAPER: The terms of the Devonshire white paper were to raise solutions to the racial conflicts in Kenya.  It was declared that Kenya was primarily an African territory and as such, the interests of Africans were to be important.  Kenyan highlands were to be reserved for only the whites’ settlement.  The document declared policies of racial discrimination in residential areas null and void.  The Asians were to move freely into Kenya.  The Asians were to elect five members to the Legislative council. A missionary was to be elected on the Legislative council to represent the interests of the Africans; Dr. Arthur was elected to this effect. The document was to recognize the contribution of the European community in the development of Kenya  It declared that there was not to be any further advance towards self-government in the near future. That Kenya was to be under Europeans. It declared that the British colonial office was to watch o
12 comments
Read more