Account for the collapse of the Co-operative Movemen in Uganda after independence

-

Collapse of the Cooperative Movement in Uganda after Independence

After independence in 1962, the cooperative movement in Uganda began to decline due to political, economic, and administrative challenges. Although cooperatives had played an important role in marketing agricultural products such as coffee and cotton, they later collapsed because of the following reasons:

1. Political instability

Uganda experienced frequent political changes after independence, especially during the governments of Milton Obote and Idi Amin. These unstable political conditions interfered with cooperative administration and weakened their operations.

2. Government interference

The government began to control cooperative societies too much. Leaders were sometimes appointed based on political loyalty rather than competence, which led to poor management and corruption within cooperatives.

3. Economic mismanagement

Poor economic policies reduced the efficiency of cooperatives. For example, nationalization policies and state control of marketing reduced incentives for farmers and weakened cooperative performance.

4. Decline in agricultural production

Cooperatives depended mainly on agricultural output. However, production declined due to lack of modern farming tools, low prices for crops, and poor transport systems. This reduced cooperative income.

5. Corruption and poor leadership

Misuse of cooperative funds by leaders discouraged members from participating. Many farmers lost trust in cooperative societies because of dishonesty and lack of accountability.

6. Expulsion of Asians in 1972

When Idi Amin expelled Asians from Uganda, many businesses and financial systems that supported cooperatives collapsed. This negatively affected cooperative marketing and management.

7. Lack of cooperative education

Many members did not fully understand how cooperatives should operate. This led to poor participation and weak management of cooperative societies.


Conclusion

The collapse of the cooperative movement in Uganda after independence was mainly caused by political interference, corruption, economic mismanagement, and declining agricultural production. These problems weakened cooperative societies and reduced farmers’ confidence in them.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reasons for the Coming of Christian Missionaries in East Africa

-
Missionaries came to East Africa for various reasons. These were economic, social, and humanitarian in nature.  The missionaries had the ambition to spread Christianity to the people of East Africa. This would be through preaching and teaching the holy gospel so that many would get converted to Christianity  They wanted to fight against slave trade in East Africa. Earlier travelers like John Speke and James Grant, H.M. Stanley, Dr. David Livingstone and others had reported about the evils of slave trade in East Africa. Christian missionaries therefore came with an intention of putting an end to end introducing or replacing it with legitimate trade.  Missionaries wanted to resettle the freed slaves in East Africa by setting up resettlement centers both in the interior and at the coast for example at Bagamoyo and Free town near Mombasa.  They wanted to check on the spread of Islam in East Africa from the coast with intentions of converting many to Christian...
Read more

TERMS OF THE DEVONSHIRE WHITE PAPER

-
THE FOLLOWING WERE THE TERMS OF DEVONSHIRE WHITE PAPER: The terms of the Devonshire white paper were to raise solutions to the racial conflicts in Kenya.  It was declared that Kenya was primarily an African territory and as such, the interests of Africans were to be important.  Kenyan highlands were to be reserved for only the whites’ settlement.  The document declared policies of racial discrimination in residential areas null and void.  The Asians were to move freely into Kenya.  The Asians were to elect five members to the Legislative council. A missionary was to be elected on the Legislative council to represent the interests of the Africans; Dr. Arthur was elected to this effect. The document was to recognize the contribution of the European community in the development of Kenya  It declared that there was not to be any further advance towards self-government in the near future. That Kenya was to be under Europeans. It declared that the British c...
Read more

Explain six differences between Direct and Indirect rule

-
 Direct and indirect rule were two distinct forms of colonial governance employed by European powers in their colonies, each with its own characteristics and methods of administration. Here are six differences between direct and indirect rule: 1. **Administrative Structure**:    - Direct Rule: In direct rule, the colonial power established a centralized administrative structure, with colonial officials and bureaucrats directly governing the colony. European administrators were appointed to key positions of authority, and decisions were made centrally from the colonial capital.    - Indirect Rule: Indirect rule involved the use of indigenous traditional authorities and institutions as intermediaries between the colonial administration and the local population. Colonial powers delegated authority to indigenous rulers or chiefs, who were expected to govern according to colonial directives and policies. 2. **Role of Indigenous Institutions**:    - Direct R...
Read more